Yes, we lost most of our posts thanks to the recent Ezboard attack. At this point things don't look too good, so I am not counting on recovering lost data anytime soon. It is increasingly looking like restoration of most lost posts won't be possible. I am still going to wait for a few more days to see if Ezboard
ings a few back.<
><
>In the meantime, I guess we'll have to start over, eh?<
><
>Ingrid~ <
><
> <
><i></i>
*** MISSING POSTS AT GAME OASIS ***
-
soloist
Re: *** MISSING POSTS AT GAME OASIS ***
Sigh... I guess so. Actually I read the report<
>and thought this scenario to be actual <
>before then... so little a surprise<
>it is. What I expected really.<
>So let us begin rebuildin-<
>g this realm. I will do <
>what I can to aid <
>this commun-<
>ity. Starti-<
>ng no-<
>w.<
><
> <i></i>
>and thought this scenario to be actual <
>before then... so little a surprise<
>it is. What I expected really.<
>So let us begin rebuildin-<
>g this realm. I will do <
>what I can to aid <
>this commun-<
>ity. Starti-<
>ng no-<
>w.<
><
> <i></i>
-
Nakor BlueRider
Re: *** MISSING POSTS AT GAME OASIS ***
Maybe my long string of mostly-groundless mini-reviews that are based entirely off of 15-60 seconds of footage each will help? <
><
>*still would really love to play Lost in Blue though ;_;* <i>There are many rules of<
>physics that govern our world.<
>There is only one exception.<
>His name is Nakor.</i><
><
>--Nakor, the Blue Rider<
><
><i></i>
><
>*still would really love to play Lost in Blue though ;_;* <i>There are many rules of<
>physics that govern our world.<
>There is only one exception.<
>His name is Nakor.</i><
><
>--Nakor, the Blue Rider<
><
><i></i>
-
soloist
Re: *** MISSING POSTS AT GAME OASIS ***
Laughs! I prefer to only review games after I have<
>completed them since I can provide a better<
>description of the title then... but that<
>does not prevention me from revie-<
>wing them. It is just my prefer-<
>ence. My mini-reviews ten-<
>d to be much longer th-<
>an I would expect t-<
>hem to be consi-<
>dering the ti-<
>tle, "mini-<
>review"<
>!!!! <i></i>
>completed them since I can provide a better<
>description of the title then... but that<
>does not prevention me from revie-<
>wing them. It is just my prefer-<
>ence. My mini-reviews ten-<
>d to be much longer th-<
>an I would expect t-<
>hem to be consi-<
>dering the ti-<
>tle, "mini-<
>review"<
>!!!! <i></i>